URD 1.0.4 is coming ...

[thorwak]

Ok, I'm done. Everything I could easily find is fixed. Fixed a few other things too that stuck out a bit in the translation (better choice of words).

Phew. feels good now

[spearhead]

You missed one:

$LN['config_perms']['none'] = 'Don\'t change';

And I made a few small changes myself... pls check if they are ok.

anyway thanks a lot for translating and mentioning a bunch of bugs. 

[thorwak]

True! Annoying, I even used that setting half an hour ago. Somehow I just didn't "see" that it was in English, weird..

I fixed it, and also one other I spotted.

How the hell did you spot my other 2 mistakes though? I'm impressed.. (Your changes are good).

There WILL be more of these however, it would need a second pair of (Swedish) eyes to spot everything the first round, it's difficult to spot one's own faults until a certain amount of times has passed (or so it seems to be for me)


(Fear not, there will be plenty of more bug reports (and wish lists, hihi) from me, there are still a few small things I think hasn't been fixed (cosmetics) but we take that after 1.0.4 I think 

[thorwak]

Suggestion, btw: One should maybe decide on either "posting" or "uploading" and not use both concepts.

And, you should update the Sourceforge page! That's how I find this project, and it would have looked even more interesting if one could see rapid updating (it's still at 1.0 over there). It was actually difficult to find URD even though it does EXACTLY what I want (well, when it becomes a bit faster in some case). Googling "usenet indexing" really should at least somehow point to URD. Maybe this post will help? 

[spearhead]

I quickly ran through all pages in swedish (fortunately the position of the buttons etc tells me what it is ) The corrections are a educated guesses.

Don't worry about the language files... as long as it is clear... I'm more than happy

I keep an eye out for your bug reports (keep m coming)

[spearhead]

Suggestion, btw: One should maybe decide on either "posting" or "uploading" and not use both concepts.

And, you should update the Sourceforge page! That's how I find this project, and it would have looked even more interesting if one could see rapid updating (it's still at 1.0 over there). It was actually difficult to find URD even though it does EXACTLY what I want (well, when it becomes a bit faster in some case). Googling "usenet indexing" really should at least somehow point to URD. Maybe this post will help? 

We moved away from SF ages ago... and uploading is crap there, so I never really bothered with it. Ggl index is a different issue... perhaps writing a small review/blogpost or whatever  here and there will help <hint> 

[thorwak]

Ok, Maybe the manual and FAQ in the program should reflect moving away from SF since users may, I dunno, follow the links provided in the Online help

Seriously though, the Manual needs a complete rewrite, and this only proves that point

EDIT: I have no experience with having a page at SF, but I DO use it a lot for finding solutions to needs I have, so I think it may pay to at least keep the page alive-looking. Just my very personal opinion though

[spearhead]

Valid points. I updated the link on SF for now... And you know how it goes with writing documentation. It just isn't fun to do :8

[thorwak]

I know, documenting sucks, I hate it to. Hell, I even hated translating it more than the other stuff

It's just that in some case it's worse to have outdated docs than none at all. Maybe if one is lucky someone would volunteer to re-write it 


I see the 1.0.4 release has been downloaded 5 times from SF, that's at least not 0

[spearhead]

most downloads come from our website
plus it is hosted on getdeb, but I can't see any stats there
and there are many other hosters....

[thorwak]

Yeah I understand that, I just meant that at least a few actually found the new release on SF after 24h, so it's not pointless to have it there as well

Have you any idea how many ppl use URD btw? (just curious)

[spearhead]

I guess somewhere around a 100 users....